Socrates on why Death is a Blessing

Plato?s Apology discusses the ladder of a philosopher from A hence(prenominal)s named Socrates. During the rill Socrates is accused of rejecting the gods of the city and creating his own, as sanitary(p) as vitiate the young of Athens. He unsuccessfully attempts to persuade the jury of his innocence, and is bestowed a finding of fact of ?guilty.? In response to the jury?s decision, Socrates attempts to expand why wipeout should be considered a blessing. I go out-of-door betoken that although Socrates presents possibilities that might await one after demolition, he does not exhaust all of these possibilities. Additionally, I will postulate that the theories Socrates claims await after last cannot necessarily be considered blessings. To examine these points, I will explain the argument and go on to show counterexamples which demonstrate the flaws in Socrates? argument. Last of all I will show that although the argument presented by Socrates may miss its shortco mings, it is ultimately a crucial step for Socrates in preserving his report card and validating his life goals. Upon receiving his verdict of ?guilty? and being sentenced to destruction, Socrates presents a speech to show why one should not caution death. He explains to the jurors they have helped him become a martyr and shows them how death will be a positive thing.

?What has happened to me may well be a good thing, and those of us who believe death to be an evil are certainly mistaken? (Apology 40b). Socrates then goes even farther and argues why death is a blessing, as death must consist of one of two thin gs: ? twain the dead are nothing and have n! o cognition of anything, or it is, as we are told, a chance and a relocating for the soul from here to another place.? He argues ?if it is complete neediness of perception, like... If you wish to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper